In the case of timepieces, wonderful or in any other case, model is commonly not a part of the package deal…a minimum of not model as outlined right here by the Oxford dictionary, which matches one thing like this: a particular look, usually decided by the ideas in line with which one thing is designed. After all, if one appears to be like at Mirriam-Webster, one finds one thing a bit of extra helpful to the concept of fashion and watchmaking: a particular high quality, kind, or sort of one thing. That one is succinct and maybe finest suited in relation to introducing a person for whom model is his whole job…effectively, part of it a minimum of.

Helpfully, Pierre Rainero, Director of Picture, Type and Heritage at Cartier, has revealed his personal definition of fashion, which I’ve referenced on a couple of event. It should now come residence to roost, which I discover most gratifying. “Type is the incarnation of a philosophy that conveys complicated issues in a easy approach. It has its personal sensibility, and thus turns into a approach of anticipating, experiencing, and speaking emotions and feelings – model, maybe, is solely the expression of a imaginative and prescient.” Rainero wrote that in his chapter within the Flamarion hardcover Cartier: The Energy of Type (2010).

Combining picture and heritage with model, and also you may assume that Rainero is the de facto inventive or inventive director, however that’s not the case. No such position exists at Cartier, though his title initially was Communication and Creative Director again in 1999. In actual fact, Rainero has held quite a lot of roles at Cartier since 1984, when he first joined. It was a time of change on the storied jewelry and watch agency, and Rainero has had a entrance seat alongside the nice names of that point…Perrin, Cologni, Fornas… We sat down with Rainero to listen to his story at Watches and Wonders Geneva 2023.

You might have a reasonably spectacular title, which you have got held since 2003. Inform us about it? 

Effectively, daily is totally different after all, as a result of in truth I’ve many alternative issues I’m concerned in… The central duty, after all, and that explains all the opposite ones (as you will note), is my involvement within the inventive course of. In order that’s successfully the model a part of my title.

In 1998, Alain Dominique Perrin was President of Cartier and he had that position (as inventive director) with out having the title – he was president, so he may do all the things. In 1999, when he was leaving to change into president of Richemont, he informed me ‘you can be the inventive director.’

So, for some time I had the Communication and Creative Director title, and really rapidly I spotted that it was not precisely what I used to be doing. For 2 causes. First, I spotted instantly that there are lots of people who find themselves accountable within the inventive course of; within the making-of means of the inventive dimension of every of our objects. There may be mainly a synergy of abilities. Most likely I may have already got recognized this (earlier than taking over the position)!

Anyway, every of those creatives has an affect on the inventive half; you already know that in jewelry, it’s much more apparent than in watches.

So that you knew that nobody particular person may do the job?

It isn’t one one who could possibly be entitled to (the complete inventive dimension) as a result of it’s not true. The second cause (that my job was not precisely what my title stated it was) was, in a approach, actually to have and share a imaginative and prescient of what a Cartier object ought to be at the moment, and naturally, within the close to future, as a result of we work some years upfront, relying on the class of things.

I’m not the inventive as a result of the inventive half is on the aspect of the designers because it has all the time been for the reason that time of Louis Cartier himself, and Jeanne Toussaint [the legendary fashion and jewellery designer]. Louis Cartier himself used to name them (the designers) the inventors.

Inform us about your portfolio as it’s at the moment, and what a typical day appears to be like like for you?

So my position (at the moment) is to debate with the creatives (the inventors), in any respect phases, about which route Cartier ought to go in direction of. (Collectively, we attempt to establish) what makes Cartier so totally different, with a historic method (for instance), and attempt to clarify why the objects had been like they had been at the moment. What was the philosophy behind these objects and the way can or does this philosophy apply at the moment. My interplay with the creatives is in any respect phases, even earlier than the design temporary.

Day-to-day, I’ve many questions arriving on my desk. Perhaps I’ve a design head, the top of a studio, saying we’re considering of doing one thing, and what do you concentrate on it. Or possibly they’ve a prototype to point out me. These are the unscheduled conferences, however after all there are many scheduled ones!

And by the way in which, the model a part of my title consists of my involvement in all the things that’s created at Cartier, just like the structure of the shops for example. I’m additionally concerned the identical approach with the architects and inside designers…I’m the hyperlink between picture and magnificence as a result of successfully the model of the shop is part of image-building, for instance. As a consequence, I’m additionally accountable for the cultural and inventive features of Cartier. This implies all Cartier’s hyperlinks with exterior establishments or faculties all around the world. , so I journey lots [before Watches and Wonders Geneva 2023, Rainero was in Mexico City for a Cartier exhibition and he went to Hong Kong the week after the fair for another exhibition scheduled to open there]. My work isn’t solely with the curators (of the exhibitions) but in addition the backroom half, together with contract negotiations and this form of factor. There may be additionally a everlasting element to this as a result of we’re all the time involved with some establishments, such because the Louvre in Paris, the British Museum and the Metropolitan in New York, as a result of they’ve Cartier items of their (respective) collections (and should purchase historic items now or in future).

Why is Cartier’s historical past so highly effective?

The historical past of Cartier and the manufacturing of Cartier each are so wealthy as a result of (amongst different issues) for the reason that first years of the twentieth century, we grew to become the primary actual (watch and jewelry Maison) on this planet. That means when it comes to innovation (by advantage of being first), sure, but in addition simply when it comes to manufacturing. We grew to become form of an object of curiosity for the folks of the entire world. A century in the past, Cartier was so large that each one the opposite jewellers had been taking a look at it and calling it the ‘Agency’ as a result of it was already one thing unimaginable. We had manufacturing already in London and New York so, as I used to say, it was actually attainable for a younger man to have a global profession at Cartier within the early twentieth century. It was actually not so removed from a global firm of at the moment. We had been sending folks to Hong Kong, to Tehran, to South America…we’ve got all of the stories of these folks (the business stories).

It’s unimaginable if you consider it, in order that’s why there’s a richness when it comes to manufacturing, and in addition totally different classes of merchandise as a result of Carter is so distinctive on this approach…and in addition of getting that watchmaking half as equal to the jewelry half. We additionally significantly improved the making of objects of many alternative varieties, and it makes Cartier one of many primary actors within the ornamental arts within the utilized arts section. There may be additionally a human dimension to this story, and I’m not referring solely to the Cartier household (in these early days) as a result of very, in a short time the household wanted lots of people to handle the corporate.

What kinds of persons are you referring to, and are you ever stunned by what you your self study in regards to the model?

So they’re much less recognized to the skin world however we at Cartier know them. I’m speaking in regards to the administrators for London and for New York, you already know the succession of them (and the numerous issues they did for Cartier)… As an illustration, the assistance we gave to Charles de Gaulle throughout World Conflict II was determined by the director, not by the Cartier household. This was simply one in all many examples, together with Jeanne Toussaint [who was not a member of the Cartier family, but was appointed Director of Fine Jewellery by Louis Cartier in 1933; she remained with the firm until 1970, after the Cartier family had sold the business].

So that you realise the facility of these folks…the artisans; it’s an unimaginable variety of folks through the years. It’s a human journey, the story of Cartier, you already know, and that makes it so wealthy. This additionally makes it troublesome to apprehend all the things about Cartier as a result of as a business entity, what we preserve in our archives is especially linked to how the corporate works and the manufacturing; that’s already crucial as a result of it’s the hyperlink with the shoppers. However you already know, of all the scale of choices taken to open a retailer or a market, we solely preserve what we’ve got a authorized obligation to maintain. The knowledge on private interactions (and the human story of the individuals who labored at Cartier), we’ve got nearly nothing, or maybe we’ve got just a few issues. In order that’s why I see there are lots of, many issues nonetheless to find…together with the rationale why the title Ronde was given to this Santos mannequin [a vintage watch worn by a Cartier employee who sat in on the interview], which is definitely not spherical in any respect…I by no means obtained a solution to my query once I first joined in 1984, and I nonetheless don’t know!

Transferring to watches and jewelry, how vital is the texture of the items versus how they give the impression of being?

In jewelry, ergonomics is essential, and actually our imaginative and prescient when it comes to watchmaking and jewelry is linked (by this). It’s a particular ability in jewelry (or to jewelry) in contemplating how the article will put on… it’s not like making little sculptures, which is one thing which may come to thoughts (as being analogous). Jewelry is worn, and worn primarily by ladies, and in addition all the time in movement, which has huge penalties for a way the jewellers conceive objects. This tradition (of creativity) from jewelry can also be crucial for watchmaking (as a result of watches are additionally worn). So if we’ve got a selected (identification) by our creations in watchmaking, it’s as a result of we had been a jeweller earlier than being a watchmaker.

I feel being a jeweller first additionally gave us (a level of) freedom in a approach and that additionally makes it completely apparent if you consider the (preliminary) determination to go on shapes. In actual fact, we grew to become the designer of shapes when it comes to watchmaking, however there’s a whole logic there as a result of we weren’t initially a supplier of actions and we weren’t on the technical aspect; we had been a creator of lovely objects. For us, a watch was an exquisite object or needed to be an exquisite object, and that’s our imaginative and prescient and explains all the things we do, until at the moment I feel.

What’s a Cartier watch design that challenged you?

Effectively, the Ballon Bleu was for me some of the fascinating workout routines I needed to face when it comes to creativity as a result of we wished a spherical watch, however usually Cartier, so it’s a contradiction in phrases. As a result of, you already know, we had been born doing all shapes however spherical (and thus recognized for our vary of assorted shapes, as I stated). Thus for Ballon Bleu, we stated let’s consider this design as if nothing is unattainable; unattainable isn’t French!

So, we went ahead and the concept was to create one thing like a pebble; the sensible thought was to eliminate the (conventional) crown) by together with it throughout the round form of the case (as a substitute of protruding because it usually does) in an area that was like a bubble. Clearly, it’s not an everyday spherical watch as a result of it’s so weird to not have the crown current as typical. However the design logic is there, and the ergonomic presence of the watch, when it comes to how delicate it feels, is there. One factor I recall completely about this mannequin is the design of the bracelet, which I assumed ought to be elegant and serviceable, not including one thing else when it comes to creativity, or one other focal point.

How a lot of Cartier’s design philosophy, so far as watches go, may be tied again to 1904?

I feel if you analyze the creations, the totally different creations when it comes to watchmaking from 1904, the unique design of the Santos (from the primary piece designed in 1904, for aviator Alberto Santos-Dumont after which the manufacturing fashions in 1911) till (the designs of) 1917, and the Nineteen Twenties…it is rather, very fascinating as a result of you have got that concept to design for the primary time an object that accommodates a watch designed particularly to be worn on the wrist (as a device).

That was sensible as a result of earlier than that, a person may solely put on a pocket watch linked with a strap on his wrist. The premise of the design for the watch Santos-Dumont would use was a sq. form with rounded corners as a result of we had pocket watches on this model. However, if we create an object, it has to have aesthetical validity; the Santos-Dumont of 1904 was legitimate as an object, however for Louis Cartier and his workforce it was not similar to the purest form attainable to realize the target (of being a terrific wristwatch). So we adopted up with the Tonneau watch simply two years (1906) later, which was greater. That’s the reason it was curved, as a result of it needed to observe the curve of a wrist. If it was smaller, it could possibly be flat, so in 1912, we got here up with the Tortue, which is the flat model.

5 years later, in 1917, it was the (now-famous) two parallel strains (that characterised the Tank). There may be nothing less complicated than two parallel strains that hyperlink up (the Tank Normale this yr harks again to this authentic Tank). In 1922, Louis Cartier himself requested to eliminate that metallic between the lugs, and to simply have the 2 parallel strains and no metallic (or as little metallic displaying as attainable). So, in our archives, this Tank is all of a sudden known as Tank Louis Cartier. Louis Cartier personally requested to try this and to provide that mannequin, you already know, and it was not usually like this, the place he interfered within the design course of. So if that watch bears that title, it’s as a result of his will to change it was very robust. The sense of purity right here is basically one thing crucial, not just for Louis Cartier however for many individuals of this time. The 2 first a long time of the twentieth century, that’s the place many revolutions occurred when it comes to design, artwork basically and lots of different areas, and Louis Cartier is a part of this new period.

This text was first revealed on WOW Autumn Subject #70

For extra on the most recent in luxurious watches, click on right here.